Convergence Conversation - brought to you by Intellect

A brief history of mobile broadcast TV in Europe: between football and political influence

In May 2006, 3 Italia launched the first mobile broadcast TV service in Italy. In an atmosphere of scepticism, the operator undertook a significant financial investment and rolled out its own DVB-H network. At the time, the operation seemed risky and there was uncertainty about the return of investment. However, the sceptics were forced to reassess their position when the football World Cup 2006 came around. By the end of the Cup in August 2006, 3 Italia had more than 100,000 mobile TV users. 3 Italia was able to offer a good deal to football fans: high-quality viewing of matches on their mobile phones at a reasonable price. The World Cup 2006 had also pushed mobile operators in other European countries, including Digita in Finland, MFD and T-Mobile in Germany, to test mobile broadcast TV services.

After football fever subsided, mobile broadcast TV once again became a contentious issue in the mobile industry. Business models, content quality, pricing strategies and regulatory issues were all variables of an equation that was difficult to solve. Viviane Reading, the EU Commissioner for Information Society and Media, energetically renewed the debate declaring that “..mobile television is a prime example of digital convergence, which can generate new business opportunities and benefit consumers. By bringing audiovisual content to personal mobile terminals, mobile TV is indeed at the cutting edge of high-value, innovative services.” (14 March 2007). Since then, the European Commission has strongly promoted the development of mobile broadcast TV, backing the DVB-H as a pan-European standard. In March 2008, DVB-H was officially included in the EU List of Standards. The EU actions fostered new trials throughout Europe, including in Eastern European countries such as Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. Other industry players have also tried to test alternative solutions to DVB-H such as TDtv and MediaFLO in the UK.

This renewed enthusiasm may potentially bring commercial solutions to the market if the national regulatory frameworks are clearly established and if mobile operators are ready to explore the mobile broadcast TV space. On the regulatory side, a recent report by the Broadcast Mobile Convergence Forum (March 2008) claimed that a clear framework has been established in Italy, Germany, Finland, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Austria. In the UK, licences are expected to be granted in Q3 2009. For mobile operators, the UEFA Euro Cup 2008 seemed to be the trigger for a launch of mobile broadcast TV services. In May 2008, commercial solutions were launched in Switzerland, Austria, and the Netherlands.

The short history of mobile broadcast TV in Europe seems to be defined by big events and strong political support. The question is whether it will be able to find its own way. Following the experience of 3 Italia, the answer should be positive. At the end of August 2007, 3 Italia claimed 700,000 mobile TV users. The company carried on investing in the service, developing a content production house. On the 6th of June 2008, 3 Italia offered the first mobile broadcast TV in Europe free of charge and ad-based. For 3 Italia, mobile TV has found its own path!    

Comments on this post

Add your comment

Your response to "A brief history of mobile broadcast TV in Europe: between football and political influence":

Additional information

Because you are not logged in, we need you to complete the following additional fields.


Cancel
  1. 1. At 10 Jun 2008 22:08, Philip Sheldrake wrote:

    Nice post Saverio... whilst not a footie fan myself, I can see how national enthusiasm for the game would drive enthusiasm for any clips anyhow anytime. Unfortunately, UK TV retailers won't witness similar enthusiasm in this country for big screen viewing this year!

    I was at today's Being Digital (www.being-digital.com) conference, and speakers placed as much emphasis on hardware and user interface as technological standards and service availability. I've heard it quoted that O2 customers on the iPhone access the Web 50 times more often than their average customer on other phones, much of it multimedia... more IPTV than mobile broadcast, but a massive shift in consumer behaviour nevertheless alluding to pent up consumer demand.

    Personally, I like the iPhone as a computing device, but it's just an average phone from my experience (of others' phones). I think this week's announcement of the iPhone UI combined with 3G data speeds (with HSDPA or so Engadget reports), will prove interesting... If tariffs continue to fall, will we bypass mobile broadcast and go straight to mobile VoD?

  2. 2. At 11 Jun 2008 12:01, Saverio Romeo wrote:

    Great comment..Philip..and difficult question at the end. The world of mobile video unicast and VoD services is certainly more developed than mobile broadcast TV solutions. Around Europe, there are successful services run by mobile operators and mobile content providers. The majority of European mobile video users used unicast services. The widespread diffusion of HSDPA/HUSPA and, then LTE, can provide these services with new energy. And, then, which one will be the winner between VoD and broadcast? But, do we need a winner? Perhaps, there could be coexistence of different services with different aims.

Cite or link to this post  Add your comment

About the author

User profile picture

Posted by
Saverio Romeo
London

Change feature settings

Choose a feature level and image for this post

Feature image
Uploads should be PNG files measuring 337 x 138 pixels
Uploading file...   Click to cancel
Save Cancel

Post information

Posted 6 Jun 2008
Last edited 9 Jun 2008
Latest revision: 3

  • Saverio Romeo can edit
  • Anyone can comment

  • No communities

  • No tags