Convergence Conversation - brought to you by Intellect

Who's afraid of the big bad social network?

We are increasingly hearing from our clients about their concerns that the social media phenomenon is starting to disrupt their business. Some ask us whether they should either establish mechanisms to manage staff usage or simply block all access to social networking sites. Others come to us from a different angle and wonder whether there are advantages to allowing open access and, if so, how to manage this.

Our view is that most companies already have lots of policies to deal with employee “personal” use of work time and facilities. People are not usually locked into the office during standard working hours and can pop out to the local shops (and perhaps come back and have their lunch working at their desk). It’s not unknown for people to make personal telephone calls on an office landline or to have personal conversations with colleagues (perhaps bemoaning England’s latest disaster at a major sports tournament, always a good topic to boost office morale).

So, it seems no more than common sense to apply a social networking policy (whether draconian or flexible) that is coherent with your other policies that address similar issues in the workplace.

The reality is that social network use is increasing substantially (according to recent Nielsen UKOM data, nearly 25% of all UK internet time is now spent on social networks and blogs) and that employees may therefore wish to use some of their inevitable downtime during office hours to access social networks. This may replace things like engaging with colleagues in their own office environment and there are certainly interesting organisational behaviour issues here for companies about their internal cohesion and the interpersonal relationships between members of staff.

And it’s actually pretty much impossible to stop people using social networks from work even if you ban web access from the browser. It is possible, although admittedly clunky, to access the web including social networks via email. It is very possible, and increasingly so, to access the web including social networks via your mobile device. The iPad and the inevitable tablet clones that will follow will only increase that possibility.

In addition, many consumer-focused companies are increasingly using social networks for outreach to their customer bases in areas like marketing and customer service. Companies increasingly want to know, and want their employees to be aware of and positively active in, how their company is perceived on social networks. It is going to be increasingly difficult for companies for whom social networks become quite strongly embedded in their business models to rigidly block access to their employees’ use of social networks from the office.

As more businesses actively use social networks to engage with their current and potential customers, and as social network use becomes second nature to people in general, the swing over time will be away from blocking access and towards managing access. It was reported last year in a survey of 1,400 CIOs at US companies (commissioned by Robert Half Technology) that over half (54%) completely block social networking access from work. By comparison, the same survey indicated that 10% of those companies surveyed allowed unrestricted access and the remainder imposed some restrictions, such as limiting it to business purposes only. My instinct would be that the 54% number will be a high point for “blocking” and it will only decrease over time. How the balance plays out between “policy-controlled” access and “open” access is more difficult to predict but both will rise in the short term.

Technical solutions are generally great for solving technical problems, for example ensuring that employee access to websites does not inadvertently download malware into company business systems. But, technical solutions are a poor approach to dealing to human behaviour issues in the workplace.

Fundamentally, we think that this is all about managing your staff effectively. In the early days, those responsible for company policies in areas like this find themselves all at sea with things they simply don’t understand and of which they have no experience. The default reaction is “ban it” but, over time, more nuanced and effective management approaches develop and the majority learn from the experiences, both the good and the bad, of those who try new approaches first.

Comments on this post

Add your comment

Your response to "Who's afraid of the big bad social network?":

Additional information

Because you are not logged in, we need you to complete the following additional fields.


Cancel
  1. 1. At 3 Sep 2010 15:26, Lindsey Annison wrote:

    Surely any company which is NOT using social media in some form (Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, Digg, Delicious, Youtube etc etc etc) might as well be keeping their employees in cupboards and closing down their business?!

    You can't stop people from communicating and the assumption that all social networks are bad must irk the hell out of companies like LinkedIn and Ecademy, and all those who benefit from using them.

    Policytool.com offers good on-the-fly social media policies for adoption within a company.

  2. 2. At 3 Sep 2010 15:26, Lindsey Annison wrote:

    Surely any company which is NOT using social media in some form (Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, Digg, Delicious, Youtube etc etc etc) might as well be keeping their employees in cupboards and closing down their business?!

    You can't stop people from communicating and the assumption that all social networks are bad must irk the hell out of companies like LinkedIn and Ecademy, and all those who benefit from using them.

    Policytool.com offers good on-the-fly social media policies for adoption within a company.

  3. 3. At 3 Sep 2010 15:58, Julian Fagandini wrote:

    Thanks for your comment(s), Lindsey.



    I quite understand your point of view. Clearly, active participation in, and management of, a social network presence is an increasingly powerful tool for companies that do it well.



    But, many of the companies I speak to are in the small- to medium-sized sector and are fairly traditional, both in terms of their market sectors and of their approaches to business. They are not leaders in these sorts of emerging commercial dynamic. They were not amongst the first "onto the internet" in the days when no-one really knew whether the web would even be a commercial environment at all (that would be those uncertain days of yore some, oh my, 15-20 years ago in the early to mid-1990s). And their businesses have survived (hence I can still be speaking to them today) and, in many cases, prospered by waiting to see how things panned out and following in the crowd. That strategy has worked on occasions perfectly well, and can and will do again in the future - it carries risks but so does being on the bleeding edge.



    This type of company is often uncertain about how to respond to any new technology ("is it a paradigm shift or is it a fad?", they ask themselves). This time around, it is the way social networks impinge on their employees and their businesses that is concerning them and they want unfussy practical guidance.



    No doubt, in five to ten years' time, all this will have played out to maturity in the same way web commerce has since the bursting of the bubble in 2000 until today. Meanwhile, I will take a look with interest at what policytool has to offer.

Cite or link to this post  Add your comment

About the author

User profile picture

Posted by
Julian Fagandini
Fagandini Associates

Change feature settings

Choose a feature level and image for this post

Feature image
Uploads should be PNG files measuring 337 x 138 pixels
Uploading file...   Click to cancel
Save Cancel

Post information

Posted 26 Aug 2010
Last edited 26 Aug 2010
Latest revision: 2

  • Julian Fagandini can edit
  • Anyone can comment

  • No categories

  • No communities

  • No tags