Convergence Conversation - brought to you by Intellect

Where is the Incentive?

Another insightful post over at 5ttH and followed up here

What is perfectly clear from the waste described in the above blog post is that not a penny of public subsidy must be allowed to go to BT unless and until there is transparency that best value for Taxpayers Money is being achieved.

No more repetitions of Iwade in other words!

Source - NewsArse.com : Nation overwhelmingly votes for tragic fireball end for BT ad couple thumbnail

The UK’s copper wire network grew in what is euphemistically referred to as an “organic” fashion without sufficient attention paid to least cost operations/maintenance.

This was largely a legacy of the Nationalised GPO years and seems to have persisted since Privatisation some quarter a century ago.

The fundamental problem with either state-monopoly or commercial monopoly is the same.

It is a problem of lack of incentive.

In other words, why care about constant gradual improvement in productivity when the costs of inefficiency can be passed onto the customer?

There is a better way to be found and that is the Community Interest monopoly.

Also posted on www.fibrestream.co.uk

Comments on this post

Add your comment

Your response to "Where is the Incentive?":

Additional information

Because you are not logged in, we need you to complete the following additional fields.


Cancel
  1. No comments on this post yet

Cite or link to this post  Add your comment

About the author

User profile picture

Posted by
Guy Jarvis
Fibrestream

Change feature settings

Choose a feature level and image for this post

Feature image
Uploads should be PNG files measuring 337 x 138 pixels
Uploading file...   Click to cancel
Save Cancel

Post information

Posted 24 Aug 2010
Last edited 24 Aug 2010
Latest revision: 1

  • Guy Jarvis can edit
  • Anyone can comment

  • No categories

  • No communities

  • No tags