Posts in Government
Null Point Jeremy
The truth of the matter is on the same webpage linked to above, that the bar is now set so low as to surely consign the UK to the back of the pack:
“90 per cent of homes and businesses having access to superfast broadband and for everyone in the UK to have access to at least 2Mbps”
90%? What about the final 10%, umm 6 Million people!
What is the official definition of Superfast Broadband anyway these days and no mention of a symmetric connection either!
Compounding the market delay and distortion that has existed through inappropriate Government meddling for more than a year already, what emerges from this whole BDUK navel-gazing exercise is a simple assurance that the UK is firmly on Track for the Worst Superfast Broadband in EU. More...
UK Superfast Broadband: Challenges and Opportunities
The deployment of IP next-generation (IP-NGN) broadband technology by BT and alternative network service providers has lagged a long way behind the original plans. Furthermore, the adoption of these services -- where they are available -- has apparently been disappointing.
Research by Point Topic shows that its overall measure of broadband coverage has actually declined -- falling from 55 percent to 53 percent in the reporting period. More...
UK Government starts Communications Act review
Is mobile data roaming structurally flawed?
He points out the possibility of the European Commission forcing a structural split between domestic and roaming service provision. Basically, there seems to be frustration that voice (and especially data) prices and consumer choices have not changed quickly enough, despite recent regulation on tariff caps and anti-billshock thresholds. In particular, there is concern that customers don't know in advance how/when/where they will travel, so they cannot make an educated decision about which tariff is "best" at the start of a contract. More...
European Commission tries to marshal stakeholders for World Radiocommunications Conference 2012
UK Govt to Fund 4G?
“…as my hon. Friend Jesse Norman suggested, instead of the mobile telephone companies paying the Treasury for that spectrum we would end up with the Treasury paying them to take it. It is perfectly possible, as was suggested, that we could make a powerful economic argument to the Treasury on why it might make sense for the Treasury to pay mobile telephone providers to take it, but to do so we would need some very robust figures.”
The logic here is impeccable – and the case for an innovative Big Society approach unmistakable. More...






